Mar 8, 2024 #trump#biden#chinaThe Biden administration is expected to loosen its rules for the country’s switch to electric vehicles (EVs), the New York Times first reported Saturday, citing three people familiar with the plan. Is this because consumers are not buying electric cars at the rate the government had hoped or is it because of the election? The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) change in its proposed rule would implement less stringent requirements for vehicle pollution in the short term — effectively allowing car manufacturers to have a smaller percentage of their fleet be electric in 2030 than under the Biden administration’s initial proposal. This would certainly help their sales and profits but not in the long haul. The rule change would be a win for car manufacturers and labor unions, allowing the industry more time to boost its EV production and charging infrastructure before regulations encroach on the gas-powered vehicle market. More consumers turned to hybrid cars instead of fully electric vehicles in 2023. EV sales made up just 7 percent of the market last year. A rule change could also smooth over political concerns from the United Auto Workers union about President Biden’s re-election campaign. Automakers and car dealers have also warned the administration about pursuing a switch to EVs too quickly. They may have convinced the Administration to act. There was pressure from the UAW to ease the mandate because it fears pushing EVs will lead to jobs losses. With the presidential election looming on the horizon, and the fact that the President needs the union’s support, it looks like the UAW got what it wants. The original emissions regulations for ICE vehicles were designed to push EV market share to 67 percent of the new car market by 2032. As of this recording, we have not seen specifics on the new rules, they would require a slower ramp-up in sales through 2030 but still require a steeper ramp-up after that. This could be good or bad news depending on who is the next president. Critics like President Donald Trump have strongly condemned Biden’s EV push. Trump has labeled the all-electric vehicle mandate as a “ridiculous all Electric Car Hoax”. He argues that such policies would lead to the demise of the American auto industry and hand over the production of electric vehicles entirely to China. Trump’s critique extends to the potential job losses in traditional automotive manufacturing hubs like Michigan, predicting a disastrous outcome should Biden’s “crazed concept” persist. The administration’s softened stance comes during an election cycle, highlighting the political calculus behind environmental policy. Senior climate adviser Ali Zaidi insists that the overarching policies, including federal investments in renewable energy, will still facilitate the achievement of cutting U.S. greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2030. Some are saying that there are some signs that the EV market in the U.S. has already topped, the key concerns for buyers appear to be cost and network reliability. If the government continues to push the agenda, automakers will get penalized with an estimated billions of dollars in fines. Even though car makers are not making profits, and the results of these factors could massively impact jobs and the economy. Thanks for watching! ** Go to https://trymintmobile.com/laurenfix – to get premium wireless for $15 a month ** ➡️ Looking for more automotive news? Go to our second channel:    / @car-smarts   ➡️ Buy me a cup of coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/laurenfix ➡️ Listen to the Total Car Score Podcast with Lauren Fix, Karl Brauer, and Javier Mota on all platforms: https://www.revolverpodcasts.com/show… ➡️ Social media: Twitter or X:   / laurenfix   FB:   / lauren.fix.the.car.coach   Instagram:   / laurenfix   Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/laurenfix Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-625957 Gab: https://gab.com/LaurenFix Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@laurenfix Substack: https://carcoachreports.substack.com/0:00 The Truth Behind Changing Electric Vehicle Rules 1:00 Impact on car makers 2:00 Election impact

Below is an updated chart including some Mercedes-Benz EV models and their original Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price (MSRP):

Manufacturer	Model	Range (miles/km)	Motor Power (kW)	Battery Capacity (kWh)	Charging Time (hours)*	Top Speed (mph/kph)	0-60 mph (seconds)	Original MSRP (USD)
Tesla	Model S	390 / 627	568	100	10 (Supercharger)	155 / 250	2.3	$79,990 – $139,990
	Model 3	353 / 568	211 (Standard)<br>324 (Performance)	54 (Standard)<br>82 (Performance)	4.5 (Supercharger)	162 / 261	3.1 (Performance)	$37,990 – $56,990
	Model X	340 / 547	568	100	10 (Supercharger)	155 / 250	2.6	$89,990 – $119,990
	Model Y	326 / 524	211 (Standard)<br>324 (Performance)	54 (Standard)<br>82 (Performance)	4.5 (Supercharger)	155 / 250	3.5 (Performance)	$49,990 – $60,990
Chevrolet	Bolt EV	259 / 417	150	66	10 (DC Fast Charge)	93 / 150	6.5	$31,995
Nissan	Leaf	149 / 240	110	40	7 (Level 2)<br>0.5-1 (DC Fast Charge)	89 / 143	7.4	$31,620 – $43,970
Audi	e-tron	222 / 357	300	95	9 (Level 2)<br>0.5 (DC Fast Charge)	124 / 200	5.5	$65,900 – $79,100
Ford	Mustang Mach-E	305 / 491	198 (Standard)<br>248 (Extended Range)	68 (Standard)<br>88 (Extended Range)	10 (DC Fast Charge)	111 / 178	3.5	$42,895 – $60,500
Porsche	Taycan	200 / 322	300 (Base)<br>460 (Turbo)<br>560 (Turbo S)	79.2 (Base)<br>93.4 (Turbo)<br>93.4 (Turbo S)	9 (DC Fast Charge)	155 / 250	2.4 (Turbo S)	$79,900 – $185,000
Mercedes-Benz	EQS	400 / 644	245	107.8	–	130 / 210	4.1	$102,310
	EQB	247 / 398	–	–	–	–	–	–
	EQA	260 / 418	–	–	–	–	–	–

*Charging times are approximate and may vary based on various factors such as charger type, battery state, and temperature.

Please note that some specifications and prices may vary based on trim levels, optional features, and market availability. For the most accurate and up-to-date information, it’s recommended to refer to the manufacturer’s official website or contact authorized dealerships.

https://www.virta.global/blog/electric-cars-pollution-facts

https://www.carbonbrief.org/factcheck-how-electric-vehicles-help-to-tackle-climate-change/

https://grist.org/business-technology/4-charts-that-show-electric-cars-bright-future/

Electric Vehicles & the Brushless DC Motor [Infographic]

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/life-cycle-emissions-evs-vs-combustion-engine-vehicles/

https://evmagazine.com/top10/top-10-ev-companies-sales-2022

THIS IS OLDER- THE TESLA TRUCK IS OUT…

Unveiling the Divide: 20 Reasons America Divides over EV vs. ICE Vehicles

The debate between Electric Vehicles (EVs) and Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) vehicles has been brewing for years, igniting passionate discussions across the automotive landscape. While some embrace the futuristic allure of EVs, others remain staunch advocates of the traditional ICE vehicles. In the heart of this division lies America, a nation torn between the allure of innovation and the comfort of tradition. Here are 20 reasons why America finds itself divided over EVs versus ICE vehicles.

1. Infrastructure Concerns: The lack of widespread charging infrastructure across America remains a significant hurdle for EV adoption, leading to range anxiety among consumers.
2. Longer Refueling Time: Compared to the quick refueling process of ICE vehicles, charging an EV can take significantly longer, disrupting the convenience factor.
3. Cost of EVs: Despite advancements, EVs often come with a higher upfront cost compared to their ICE counterparts, deterring budget-conscious consumers.
4. Range Anxiety: The fear of running out of battery power before reaching a charging station remains a prevalent concern among potential EV buyers.
5. Perceived Performance Gap: Some consumers believe that ICE vehicles offer superior performance in terms of acceleration, speed, and towing capacity compared to EVs.
6. Dependency on Electricity Grid: Concerns about the reliability and sustainability of the electricity grid fuel skepticism about widespread EV adoption.
7. Lack of Variety: While the EV market is expanding, it still offers fewer options in terms of vehicle types, sizes, and models compared to the well-established ICE market.
8. Resale Value Uncertainty: The uncertainty surrounding the long-term resale value of EVs compared to ICE vehicles adds another layer of hesitation for potential buyers.
9. Charging Time vs. Refueling Time: Even with advancements in fast-charging technology, the time it takes to recharge an EV is still perceived as a drawback compared to the quick refueling process of ICE vehicles.
10. Environmental Concerns: While EVs are touted as environmentally friendly, the manufacturing processes and sourcing of materials for batteries raise questions about their true ecological impact.
11. Government Subsidies and Incentives: The perception that EVs receive preferential treatment through government subsidies and incentives creates resentment among some ICE vehicle supporters.
12. Tradition and Heritage: For many Americans, the ICE engine represents a tradition deeply ingrained in the country’s automotive history, making it challenging to embrace the shift towards EVs.
13. Job Displacement: The transition to EVs could potentially disrupt traditional automotive jobs, leading to concerns about unemployment in certain sectors.
14. Ownership Experience: Some consumers enjoy the tactile experience of maintaining and working on ICE vehicles, an aspect that is diminished with the simpler mechanics of EVs.
15. Concerns About Battery Life: Questions about the longevity and degradation of EV batteries over time contribute to skepticism about their overall reliability and cost-effectiveness.
16. Inadequate Public Education: Misinformation and lack of public education about EVs contribute to misconceptions and resistance to adopting new technology.
17. Cultural Resistance: In certain segments of American culture, there exists a resistance to change, particularly when it comes to embracing new technologies like EVs.
18. Range and Performance in Extreme Conditions: EVs may struggle with range and performance in extreme weather conditions, such as extreme cold or heat, further exacerbating range anxiety.
19. Perceived Lack of Power: Despite advancements in EV technology, there remains a perception among some consumers that EVs lack the power and performance of traditional ICE vehicles.
20. Manufacturing Dependency: Concerns about dependency on foreign countries for the production of key EV components, such as batteries, raise national security concerns among some Americans.

In conclusion, the divide between EVs and ICE vehicles in America is multifaceted, rooted in concerns ranging from infrastructure and cost to tradition and cultural resistance. Bridging this gap will require a combination of technological advancements, infrastructure development, public education, and policy initiatives aimed at addressing the diverse array of concerns held by consumers on both sides of the debate. As the automotive industry continues to evolve, navigating these challenges will be crucial in shaping the future of transportation in America.

Mercedes-Benz, like many other automakers, has been actively developing and introducing electric vehicles (EVs) as part of its broader strategy to transition towards sustainable mobility. Here are some of the Mercedes-Benz EV vehicles that were available or announced up to that point:

1. Mercedes-Benz EQC: The EQC was one of Mercedes-Benz’s first all-electric SUVs, offering a blend of luxury, performance, and electric efficiency. It features dual electric motors and a range of advanced technologies.
2. Mercedes-Benz EQS: The EQS is the flagship luxury sedan in Mercedes-Benz’s EQ lineup. It boasts cutting-edge design, innovative technology, and a long electric range, positioning it as a direct competitor to other luxury electric vehicles like the Tesla Model S.
3. Mercedes-Benz EQB: The EQB is an electric compact SUV designed to offer versatility and practicality in an emissions-free package. It features a spacious interior and a range of driving assistance systems.
4. Mercedes-Benz EQA: The EQA is a compact electric SUV that combines sleek design with electric performance. It offers a range of powertrain options and advanced connectivity features.
5. Mercedes-Benz EQV: The EQV is an all-electric version of Mercedes-Benz’s popular V-Class MPV. It offers spacious seating for up to seven passengers and a range suitable for long journeys.
6. Mercedes-Benz EQE: The EQE is a midsize electric sedan positioned below the flagship EQS. It promises a balance of performance, luxury, and electric range, targeting a broader market segment.
7. Mercedes-AMG EQS: Mercedes-AMG, the performance division of Mercedes-Benz, has also announced plans to release high-performance electric models under the EQ brand. The EQS from AMG is expected to offer exhilarating performance alongside the luxury and refinement expected from Mercedes-Benz vehicles.

Regarding the politics surrounding Mercedes-Benz EV vehicles, several factors come into play:

1. Regulatory Environment: Political decisions regarding emissions regulations, fuel economy standards, and incentives for electric vehicles can significantly impact the market for EVs. Mercedes-Benz, like other automakers, must navigate these regulations while also adapting its product lineup to meet evolving standards.
2. Government Incentives: Political support for electric vehicles often includes incentives such as tax credits, rebates, and grants aimed at encouraging consumers to adopt EVs. Mercedes-Benz may lobby for supportive policies that benefit its electric vehicle offerings.
3. Infrastructure Development: The expansion of charging infrastructure is essential for the widespread adoption of electric vehicles. Political decisions regarding infrastructure funding, regulations, and planning can influence the availability and accessibility of charging stations, affecting the viability of Mercedes-Benz EVs.
4. International Trade Policies: Mercedes-Benz is a global company, and political decisions regarding trade tariffs, import/export regulations, and international agreements can impact its ability to manufacture and sell electric vehicles in different markets.
5. Environmental Policy: As concerns about climate change grow, there is increasing political pressure to reduce carbon emissions from transportation. Mercedes-Benz may align its EV strategy with political objectives aimed at reducing the automotive industry’s environmental impact.

Overall, the politics surrounding Mercedes-Benz EV vehicles are intertwined with broader debates and decisions related to energy, transportation, and environmental policy. As the automotive industry continues to transition towards electrification, political factors will play a significant role in shaping the landscape for electric vehicles.

Certainly, let’s break down the political, health-related, and general pros and cons of both Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) vehicles and Electric Vehicles (EVs):

Political Reasons for Internal Combustion Engines:

1. Economic Interests: The ICE industry represents a significant portion of many economies, including manufacturing, oil, and associated services. Political ties and lobbying efforts from these sectors often influence policies to support ICE vehicles.
2. Employment Concerns: Many jobs are tied to the production, maintenance, and distribution of ICE vehicles. Politicians may support policies favoring ICE vehicles to protect these jobs and industries.
3. International Relations: Some nations rely heavily on oil imports, and their political relationships with oil-producing countries can influence their support for ICE vehicles.

Health Reasons Associated with Internal Combustion Engines:

1. Air Pollution: ICE vehicles emit pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (NOx), particulate matter, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), contributing to poor air quality and adverse health effects, including respiratory problems and cardiovascular diseases.
2. Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Combustion of fossil fuels in ICE vehicles releases carbon dioxide (CO2), a major contributor to climate change and associated health impacts such as extreme weather events, heatwaves, and rising sea levels.

Benefits and Challenges of EVs:

Benefits:

1. Reduced Emissions: EVs produce zero tailpipe emissions, reducing air pollution and mitigating health risks associated with ICE vehicle emissions.
2. Energy Independence: EVs can be powered by domestically produced electricity, reducing dependence on imported oil and enhancing energy security.
3. Lower Operating Costs: EVs have lower fueling and maintenance costs compared to ICE vehicles due to cheaper electricity and fewer moving parts.

Challenges:

1. Charging Infrastructure: The availability of charging stations remains a challenge, especially in rural and less developed areas, hindering widespread adoption of EVs.
2. Range Anxiety: Limited driving range and longer recharging times compared to refueling gasoline vehicles can deter potential buyers, especially for long-distance travel.
3. Battery Production and Recycling: The production and disposal of EV batteries raise concerns about environmental impacts, resource extraction, and recycling infrastructure.

Benefits and Challenges of Internal Combustion Engines:

Benefits:

1. Refueling Convenience: Gasoline and diesel vehicles can be refueled quickly at existing gas stations, offering greater convenience for long-distance travel.
2. Established Infrastructure: The infrastructure to support ICE vehicles, including fueling stations, repair shops, and manufacturing facilities, is well-established and widely available.
3. Familiar Technology: Many consumers are accustomed to ICE vehicles’ technology and performance, making them hesitant to switch to EVs.

Challenges:

1. Emissions and Pollution: ICE vehicles contribute to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, leading to environmental degradation and associated health risks.
2. Volatility in Fuel Prices: Gasoline and diesel prices can fluctuate due to geopolitical tensions, supply disruptions, and market speculation, affecting consumers’ transportation costs.
3. Dependency on Fossil Fuels: ICE vehicles rely on finite fossil fuel resources, contributing to resource depletion, geopolitical conflicts, and climate change.

In summary, the political, health-related, and general considerations surrounding ICE vehicles and EVs highlight complex trade-offs between economic interests, environmental concerns, and public health outcomes. Policymakers face the challenge of balancing these competing interests while promoting sustainable transportation solutions for the future.

Mar 18, 2024 #WSJ#Cybersecurity#EVElectric vehicle chargers are plagued with security flaws that could expose sensitive data, compromise Wi-Fi networks and in a worst-case scenario, bring down power grids. Today’s EVs have more lines of code than a modern passenger jet, making them increasingly vulnerable to cyberattacks. WSJ reveals how EV chargers can be hacked, and what it will take to protect the world’s rapidly growing EV infrastructure from cybercriminals. Chapters: 0:00 EV chargers vulnerabilities 0:44 How to hack into an EV charger 4:06 Power grid implications 6:49 Cybersecurity News Explainers Some days the high-speed news cycle can bring more questions than answers. WSJ’s news explainers break down the day’s biggest stories into bite-size pieces to help you make sense of the news. #EV#Cybersecurity#WSJ

New UCS study shows EVs are cleaner than ICE vehicles

AND THERE’S BOEING…

“Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that most frightens us.’ We ask ourselves, Who am I to be brilliant, gorgeous, talented, and fabulous? Actually, who are you not to be? You are a child of the Universe. Your playing small does not serve the world. There is nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people will not feel insecure around you. We are all meant to shine, as children do. We were born to make manifest the glory that is within us. It is not just in some of us; it is in everyone and as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give others permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others. -” Marianne Williamson https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mariann… https://linktr.ee/desirelovell

TXT 501-650-4844 for a TEST-DRIVE DESIREE LOVELL at MERCEDES-BENZ of Little Rock #benzsociety #gle #amg #s #mercedesbenz #w #coupe #mercedes #g #glc #c #glecoupe #e #brabus #samg #mercedesamg #mercedesgle #scoupe #ml #cls #amggt #happynewyear #amgcoupe #v #newyearseve #cars #firworks #amgpower #cla #newyearevefireworks #amgperformance Mercedes GLE AMG 63 S – Beast! That’s how a car should sound like! #glecoupe #suv #mercedesbenz #mercedesbenzoflr #littlerock #arkansas TikTok @desirelovell2022 🔥💗💻🖥️ #desirelovell 🤍 🌸⌨️🤖YouTube @desirelovell I do work at Mercedes-Benz (as a Sales Representative) – BUT All Opinions Expressed on This Channel Are My Own and Do Not Reflect Necessarily Those of My Employer – Mercedes-Benz of Little Rock 8 Colonel Glenn Plaza Dr. Little Rock, AR 72210 dlovell@winrockautomotive.com Cell: 501-650-4844 Dealership: 501-666-9457 https://linktr.ee/desirelovell

deep state

http://nordvpn.com/johnnyharris

DEEP STATE

1. a body of people, typically influential members of government agencies or the military, believed to be involved in the secret manipulation or control of government policy.”the deep state and its policy of allowing extremist ideologies to flourish may be the actual issues of concern”

Mar 13, 2024Trump was Right, the Deep State is Real Exclusive! Grab the NordVPN deal ➼ https://nordvpn.com/johnnyharris and get 4 extra months. Try it risk-free now with a 30-day money-back guarantee! With all the allegations about a group of unelected men making decisions that impact the rest of the country, we wanted to dig into the documents and talk to experts to find the truth. Is there a Deep State? And if so, how deep does it go? We wanted to give a special thanks to Jefferson Morely for his extensive research and writing surrounding this topic and for taking time interview with us. Be sure to check out his blog: https://jfkfacts.substack.com/ and his other work. My videos go live early on Nebula. Sign up now and get my next video before everyone else: https://www.nebula.com/johnnyharris Check out all my sources for this video here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L… — VIDEO CHAPTERS — 0:00 Intro 7:26 Origins of the Deep State 13:55 Rise of the CIA 19:58 The Church Hearings 25:41 Post 9/11